How Did The Squirrel Justify What He Was Doing?
So, what’s the moral of this story? If the mountain is too big to be climbed by the squirrel, he should retreat to the forest. Similarly, if the mountain thinks he’s important enough, he should climb the mountain. In either case, both have their special talents and places in the world. So, why did the mountain tease the little prig?
Table of Contents
Quarrel between a squirrel and a mountain
The story begins with a mountain teasing a squirrel. The mountain said that the squirrel was too big to climb, and the squirrel replied by saying that the mountain isn’t. The squirrel argues that every person has his or her own value, and the mountain has no right to be proud of its size. The mountain calls the squirrel a ‘Little Prig.’ This is the first time a squirrel has called himself a ‘prig,’ which is a term he uses to describe a fellow human being.
Rationalization of retreat
In a recent survey of over 2000 squirrels, researchers found that the majority of respondents thought that immunocontraception or surgical sterilisation was a better way to control the population. Both of these measures are considered more humane than lethal control, and are effective at maintaining territorial boundaries. By using these methods, the squirrels can benefit from the same resources as one another, while ensuring that they can exploit those resources in different ways and at different times.
‘All is well and wisely put’
In ‘All is well and wisely put,’ Robert Frost writes about a squirrel who justifies the existence of different things in the world. The poet refers to the various talents and roles of every creature on earth, and states that each one has a unique importance. The poem also states that every thing on earth is a gift from the Creator and has different reasons for existing. It is therefore not surprising that all things on earth have different reasons for existing.
The poem contains several sentences which ask the question, “How did the squirrel justify what he was doing?” The answer is found in the line, “Bun replied, ‘You’re doubtless very big, but you can’t carry a forest on your back.’” In other words, the mountain thought it was more important because it was bigger. However, the squirrel responded by saying he’s a small prig, and he was lively. The mountain feels proud of his size.
Rama’s advice to the monkeys
In the epic Ramayana, we see a scene in which Rama offers Sugriva friendship. Sugriva hesitates to accept this offer, wondering how a monkey could become a friend of God. Nonetheless, Rama persists and asks if Sugriva will accept his friendship. In response, Sugriva explains that he is a monk who has learned from the lessons of life.
‘Former’ and ‘Latter’
The main idea of this poem is that all things in the universe are different. The squirrel refers to the fact that everyone on earth has unique talents and importance. Therefore, all things on earth are important and have their own reasons. In this poem, the squirrel uses several different arguments to justify his actions. Read on to understand how the squirrel justified what he was doing. This poem can also be used as an introduction to the idea of evolution and its effects on the world.
‘All is well’
The writer, Henry, tries to justify his actions by comparing them to nature. He ponders the fact that even the smallest creatures know when to run away for safety, but questions whether human beings should be any different. Nevertheless, he finds it difficult to rationalize his actions when they fall outside the norm. This ability becomes important later in the book. It also helps the reader understand Henry’s motivations.
How did the squirrel justify what he was doing?
The squirrel justified his actions by saying that he needed the money to buy food for his family.
Why did the squirrel resort to stealing?
The squirrel resorted to stealing because he was unable to find food for his family.
How did the squirrel’s actions affect the other animals?
The squirrel’s actions affected the other animals because they were scared of him and didn’t want him near them.
Did the other animals understand why the squirrel was doing what he was doing?
No the other animals didn’t understand why the squirrel was doing what he was doing.
How did the squirrel feel about what he was doing?
The squirrel felt bad about what he was doing but he justified it by saying that he needed to do it to survive.
Did the squirrel’s family approve of his actions?
No the squirrel’s family didn’t approve of his actions but they understand why he did it.
What would have happened if the squirrel didn’t steal?
If the squirrel didn’t steal he would have starved to death.
Was the squirrel’s actions right or wrong?
While the squirrel’s actions were technically wrong he felt that he had to do it to survive.
What would you have done if you were in the squirrel’s position?
If I were in the squirrel’s position I would have tried to find food for my family in other ways before resorting to stealing.
Do you think the squirrel did the right thing?
No I don’t think the squirrel did the right thing but I understand why he did it.
Would you have been okay with the squirrel stealing from you?
No I would not have been okay with the squirrel stealing from me but I would understand why he did it.
How do you think the other animals felt about the squirrel?
The other animals probably felt scared and threatened by the squirrel.
Do you think the other animals would have helped the squirrel if they knew he was struggling?
It’s hard to say.
Some of the other animals might have helped the squirrel if they knew he was struggling but others would probably have been too afraid of him.
Do you think the squirrel did what he had to do to survive?
Yes I think the squirrel did what he had to do to survive.
What do you think the squirrel learned from this experience?
The squirrel probably learned that stealing is not the best way to get food but it is a way to survive when necessary.
Jessica Watson is a PHD holder from the University of Washington. She studied behavior and interaction between squirrels and has presented her research in several wildlife conferences including TWS Annual Conference in Winnipeg.